Published fact vs estimate
Directly published figures should be distinguished from JusticeSA calculations and modelled estimates. Important model outputs are explicitly labelled as estimates.
Accuracy & corrections
If our calculations are wrong, show us where.
JusticeSA's credibility depends on making it possible for people who disagree with us to inspect the evidence. Material mistakes should be corrected openly rather than quietly hidden.
Submit evidence or a correctionPrimary sources first
Where practical, JusticeSA links to official statistics, legislation, Government material and original reports rather than relying only on secondary commentary.
Correlation is not causation
In Campaign 1, a wealth difference does not by itself prove which policy caused it. JusticeSA should say when the evidence establishes an association, a hypothesis or a causal conclusion.
Criticism is evidence too
Specific criticism that identifies a data problem, methodological flaw or missing context should be considered on its merits regardless of the critic's political viewpoint.
Material corrections are visible
If an error changes a significant conclusion, figure or campaign statement, JusticeSA should correct the page and add an entry to the correction log below.
AI assistance is disclosed
Where ChatGPT or other AI materially assists research, calculations or drafting, JusticeSA should disclose that assistance and remain responsible for checking the result.
Correction log
Material public corrections
No material correction has been recorded on this page yet. Minor spelling, formatting or presentation changes do not need a log entry unless they alter meaning.
How to challenge a JusticeSA claim
Please identify the exact page, statement or number; provide the source or reasoning that you believe contradicts it; and explain what correction you propose. Good-faith criticism is welcome.